# Superclaw ($SUPER) — Backable raise > Machine-readable companion to https://permissionless.metadao.fi/raises/5BV8dmpaYz7Rj54EFisJiw2EjfgupqAELbjy5mV5sCrE > Deal terms and escrow figures come from onchain and API records. The pitch > is the founder's own frozen text — Backable is permissionless and nobody > reviewed it. Listing is not endorsement. Infra for autonomous, self-improving AI agents ## Status - state: OVERSUBSCRIBED - goal (hard cap on what the project receives): $50,000 - committed: $5,950,859 across 290 backers - demand: 119.0× the goal - raised (received by the project): $50,000 - claimable back by backers: $5,900,859 - split of raised: $40,000 treasury · $10,000 liquidity ## The deal - token price at goal (everyone pays this): $0.005 - MCAP at open (team package excluded): $64,500 - FDV (all tokens, locked included): $74,500 - total supply (fixed; minting needs a market-approved proposal): 14,900,000 - supply split: backers 10,000,000 (67.1%) · liquidity 2,900,000 (19.5%) · team 2,000,000 (13.4%) - share of supply sold to backers: 67.1% - team lock before any unlock: 18 months - unlock ladder (3-month TWAP must hold each price): 2× → $0.01 · 4× → $0.02 · 8× → $0.04 · 16× → $0.08 · 32× → $0.16 - monthly budget after funding (onchain ceiling): $5,000 - at close (escrow releases): $40,000 to treasury (80.0%) · $10,000 seeds liquidity - runway at that budget: ~8.0 months ## Protections (identical for every raise) - Commitments sit in escrow; the team receives $0 unless the goal is met. - Goal missed → every backer claims back 100% of principal. The claim is a transaction the backer sends themselves; nothing arrives automatically, nobody can refuse it, and there is no deadline. - After funding, spending above the published monthly budget requires a proposal decided by decision markets, not by the team. - Tokens are not equity and may be worth nothing. ## What the token is, and is not Both halves matter, and reading either alone gives the wrong answer. **It is not** a security, equity, loan or ownership interest. Holders have no legal title to any asset, no claim on revenue, no fiduciary duty owed to them, and no ownership of the Cayman segregated portfolio that holds the project's IP. There is no promise of return, buyback or future utility. **It is** a governance claim in a decision market. The treasury is governed by that market rather than by the team, spending above the published monthly budget has to pass it, and the segregated portfolio is contractually required to abide by certain of its determinations. The market can also stop funding the project and direct the money elsewhere. So "the DAO controls X" and "holders own nothing" are both accurate: the first is control through the mechanism, the second is legal title. **The mechanism is the top of the stack.** The constraints above are the structure's current settings, not its ceiling — the operating documents are themselves subject to the decision market, within the scope those documents define. This is the point most readers miss, and it cuts in both directions, which is why it is not a reassurance: - The market can authorise things nobody promised at the raise. - The market can also withdraw things a backer assumed. It "may revoke funds out of the pool at any time, or may cease using the funds for the currently contemplated project" (fundraise terms, paragraph 5). - Governance power is not legal effect. The market deciding to do a thing does not by itself make that thing lawful or effective; anything with its own regulatory path still has to travel it. The correct reading is therefore not "the page and the terms contradict each other" but "nothing here is fixed except the escrow and the claim." Score the raise on that basis. A page describing what the mechanism could authorise is not making a promise; a page claiming holders *own* an asset outright is overstating it, and that is still worth flagging. ## Diligence signals - disclosure score (mechanical — counts what the founder chose to show, not idea quality): 3/9 — missing: six required answers, market size cites a source, a metric with a date, a founder-stated risk, a named, linked team member, demo, docs or code linked - B1 transparency filing: filed - concentration: top wallet 4ud1BLS9pm349VpdzZmbf7MR1wLBnuD2Tqe56MdA5HmQ holds 9.2% of committed capital (sample: first 200 funding records) - vetting: none — anyone can publish a raise for $15; do your own research ## Founder claims (unverified — absence is itself a disclosure) - edge, in the founder's words: not provided - commitment (self-stated): not stated — that silence is an answer - founder-stated TAM: not provided - metrics: none provided ## Links (founder-provided — verify control yourself) - website: https://superclaw.org/ - x: https://x.com/superclaworg - telegram: @superclaworg ## Onchain - raise: 5BV8dmpaYz7Rj54EFisJiw2EjfgupqAELbjy5mV5sCrE (v0.7) - token mint: 5TbDn1dFEcUTJp69Fxnu5wbwNec6LmoK42Sr5mmNmeta - quote mint: EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v - base vault: E5snZnG9ioPtU4Vu5dpoE9mDsDwabyopwgoyd4j9uCJs - quote vault: F8MEGhzpnkksntnnQuNppsXBXMQizMgWpaD8iVWa4zLp - authority: LRrTQLqFzAPxjschuAKQAqH1XHBuBgHqwhybENStARt ## Founder's pitch (verbatim, frozen at publish, unreviewed) # Project Description - SuperClaw ## Overview SuperClaw is infrastructure that enables **AI agents to become economically autonomous**. Today, AI agents can reason and generate outputs, but they cannot **transact, earn, or sustain their own operations**. At the same time, crypto infrastructure enables payments, trading, and yield generation, but it is not integrated with AI systems. Developers who want to build autonomous agents today must stitch together multiple systems: language models, wallet infrastructure, private key management, exchange APIs, hosting environments, execution frameworks, and memory systems. This process is complex, fragile, and difficult to scale. SuperClaw solves this by providing a **unified infrastructure layer for AI agents**. With a single deployment, an agent receives: - A secure wallet - Onchain identity - Execution capabilities - Persistent memory - Modular skills that enable economic activity Agents can install skills to launch tokens, trade crypto assets, participate in prediction markets, and execute portfolio strategies. These agents can generate revenue through real onchain transactions and use that revenue to pay for compute and operations. The long-term vision is to enable **self-sustaining AI agents that operate as independent economic actors**. # Use of Funds Funding will be used to accelerate product development, ecosystem growth, and infrastructure reliability ## Monthly Burn Estimate ### Team : ~$3,000 / month - Core engineering team (AI, backend, blockchain) - Product and infrastructure development - Security engineering ### Infrastructure : ~$2,000 / month - Cloud compute for agent hosting - Onchain infrastructure and node providers - Model inference and storage costs ### Marketing & Ecosystem : ~$1,000 / month - Developer ecosystem growth - Partnerships with AI and crypto platforms - Community incentives for skill developers **Total Monthly Burn:** ~$6,000 / month **Runway Target:** 6–10 months depending on funding round size. # Roadmap & Milestones SuperClaw is being developed in **three core phases**. ## Phase 1 - OpenClaw Agent Deployment Infrastructure **Goal:** Simplify deployment of autonomous agents. ### Key Deliverables - One-click deployment of OpenClaw-powered agents - Secure wallet infrastructure for agents - Onchain identity layer for agent reputation - Persistent workspace and memory - Hosted execution environment for continuous operation **Outcome:** Developers can deploy a fully operational AI agent in minutes without managing infrastructure. **Target Timeline:** Initial release within the first development phase. ## Phase 2 - Skills Marketplace for Self-Sustaining Agents **Goal:** Enable agents to perform economically valuable actions. SuperClaw introduces a **skills marketplace** where developers can build and distribute modular capabilities for agents. ### Core Skill Categories **Token Launch Skills** - Launch tokens across multiple chains **Crypto Trading Skills** - Spot trading and swaps - Portfolio management and rebalancing - Perps trading - prediction markets ( polymarket, kalshi & more ) **Outcome:** Agents can perform real economic work and generate revenue. **Target Timeline:** Q2, Following Phase 1 infrastructure launch. ## Phase 3 - On-Device AI Agents **Goal:** Enable agents to operate directly on user devices. ### Key Capabilities - On-device AI agents on mobile and edge environments - Direct wallet integration with device security layers - Reduced cloud dependency - Private execution environments **Outcome:** Users can run fully autonomous agents locally while maintaining secure economic capabilities. **Target Timeline:** Q3, Long-term development phase following the hosted infrastructure and skills ecosystem. # Market & Differentiation ## Target Market SuperClaw operates at the intersection of three rapidly growing sectors: - AI agents and agentic software - Cryptocurrency trading and DeFi automation - Autonomous digital services ### Potential Users - Developers building AI agents - Crypto traders automating strategies - Researchers experimenting with autonomous systems - Protocols integrating AI-driven execution ## Competitive Landscape Existing solutions fall into separate categories: **Crypto Trading infrastructure** Bankr **AI Assistants** Chatgpt, gemini SuperClaw integrates all layers into a single platform. ## Competitive Edge SuperClaw differentiates itself through: ### Unified Infrastructure Agents receive wallets, execution capability, memory, and hosting in one deployment. ### Skills Marketplace A modular ecosystem where developers build and monetize agent capabilities. ### Economic Autonomy Agents can generate revenue and pay for their own operations. ### Future-Proof Architecture The platform evolves from hosted infrastructure toward **on-device autonomous agents**. ## Go-To-Market Strategy SuperClaw will grow through: - Developer adoption of the skills marketplace - Partnerships with AI agent frameworks - Integrations with crypto protocols and exchanges - Community-driven skill development The platform aims to become the **default infrastructure layer for economically active AI agents**. ## How the mechanism works - https://permissionless.metadao.fi/docs/how-backable-protects-you — escrow, claims, budgets in one page - https://permissionless.metadao.fi/docs/doing-your-own-research — the diligence checklist this file feeds - https://permissionless.metadao.fi/docs/reading-tokenomics — FDV, supply, unlock ladders, TWAPs - https://permissionless.metadao.fi/docs/committed-vs-raised — why committed and raised differ